However the excruciatingly correct translation of a sentence consisting of just the word for "make" would actually be something like:Ī person or computer fluent in Lojban understands that the word for make has a "place structure" of three variables essentially, and in this case the speaker or writer has chosen to omit values for these variables either because they are unknown, unimportant, or understood from context. The language certainly allows "Make!" as a complete sentence - there is nothing grammatically incorrect about that at all. There is nothing in the language that forces you to be unambiguous, but the speaker and listener would always be completely aware of precisely where the ambiguities are. I have done some reading about Lojban and I just wanted to comment that you seem to have misunderstood a bit of how the language works. Robert Heinlein promoted this language's predecessor "Loglan" in his novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. Instead, there are sixteen sentences one can make, each one unambiguously expressing one of the sixteen possibilities. In Lojban, it is impossible to create such an ambiguous sentence. A (pretty (little girls')) school = A school for attractive small girls.A ((pretty little) girls') school = A school for fairly small girls.A (pretty little) (girls' school) = A fairly small school for girls.A pretty ((little girls') school) = An attractive school for small girls.
MICHAEL MORLEY THE DARK CRYPT 3.5 MAP SOFTWARE
Lojban's grammar was validated with the help of YACC, which is a software tool used to validate computer programming languages. A complete sentence of this form is called a "Bridi". Unless you fill in the words for the arguments x, y, and z you do not have a complete sentence. For instance, the Lojban word for "make" literally means "x makes y using material z" (e.g., "Thomas makes a blowgun using bamboo"). They require other words (the "sumti" or "arguments") to complete them. Some types of words (called "selbri") are Predicate words. This is not possible for, say, English, if you remove the spaces between the words in the following sentences, all the sentences sound the identical: It is created in such a way that even if one speaks a Lojban sentence with no spaces between the words, you can parse the sentence unambiguously in your mind (the technical term is "lack of word boundary ambiguity"). Lojban also has an interesting intonation and word structure. Lojban has none of this mess, there are no silent letters and each letter has one and only one sound. For example then and thin both use "th" even though they are two different word sounds, and there are no other letters that can be used distinguish the voiced and unvoiced "th" sound. What is worse is in English there are some different word sounds that share the exact same letter coding and there are no alternatives. "s" is an s-sound in tick s but a z-sound in pig s. "ea" is pronounced two different ways in m ean and m eant.
The "g" is silent in si gn but not silent in si gnature. For example: "gh" is pronounced "f" at the end of rou gh, but pronounced "g" at the start of ghost.
The letters in Lojban each denote a single phoneme, instead of the multiple phonemes English uses. The grammar is based on Boolean algebra (it is possible to use a subset of Lojban as a computer programming language). In my opinion, a much better choice is the language Lojban.
0 kommentar(er)
